Third, I was reading a czech article on the design of the '52 a few months ago (thank you google translate!) and the author made no mention of over-pressure or machine gun ammo. There were several machine guns made in 7.62x25 (such as the PPSh) but they all appear to have been intended to use standard pressure rounds. Second, I've never found any solid evidence of over-pressure machine gun ammo in 7.62x25. First, the chamber wall thicknesses on a CZ52 are actually thinner than on a Tokarev, meaning (naturally) that it can withstand less pressure than the Tok. The previous owner also mentioned it had been "parkerized." Parkerizing (also called phosphating and phosphatizing) is a method of protecting a steel surface from corrosion and increasing its resistance to wear through the application of an electrochemical phosphate conversion coating.Ĭlick to expand.Not to start an argument or impugn you but I don't believe this is right. Matching serial numbers on barrel, frame, and slide Letter T inside a circle, indicating a military testing mark.Ĥ. Czechoslovakian Army acceptance mark of two crossed swords plus last two digits of year of manufacture (1954.)ģ. Code rid indicates military manufacture, not civilian made.Ģ. Great gun, like it better than PF9 for sure and ill do a better review for it soon.įound out some interesting facts from my serial number:ġ. Its easy to field strip, and all you need to do so is the butt of the magazine (which hopefully every Czech soldier would have.) I deep cleaned it, used some Hopp's in the barrel and lubed it up, cant believe what great condition it is in. Sights were off to the left at 25 yards moved it in to 15 yards and it was right on. Shot it this morning went through about fifty rounds with zero malfunctions. Traded a Kel-Tec PF9 (too small for me) for a 1954 CZ52.
0 kommentar(er)
